Control
of Coccidiosis in Caged Egg Layers:
A Paper Plate
Vaccination Method
Roberto
Soares, Tom Cosstick and Eng-Hong Lee
Vetech
Laboratories Inc., 131 Malcolm Road, Guelph,
Ontario, Canada N1K 1A8
Published in:
Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 2004. 13(2): 360-363.
Summary
Coccidiosis
continues to affect caged layers worldwide despite keeping them on wire
all their productive lives. Coccidiosis in caged layers, diagnosed
either in clinical or sub-clinical forms, has one feature in common,
unpredictability. Until recently, despite the use of vaccine,
coccidiosis remained problematic, particularly at the beginning of lay,
likely related to the low protective immunity for a lack of vehicle for
recycling. An approach for using paper plates, both for vaccination as
well as recycling is described. Caged layers that were vaccinated once
with gel-puck coccidiosis vaccine laid at over 90% continuously for
over 24 weeks with little or no problem of coccidiosis.
Description of Problem
Coccidiosis,
a common challenge for birds reared
on litter, does not seem to be controlled by the use of wire cages and
continues to affect layers worldwide mostly during rearing and early
egg
production. This is in contrast to the concept that the problem of
coccidiosis
has been essentially eliminated from the layer operation when pullets
were
started on wire from day one and kept on wire through to the end of the
laying
cycle [1].
In Canada,
commercial layer operations have been suffering the consequences of
coccidiosis
more often now than in the recent past [2]. The reasons are not yet
clear, but
it has been attributed to the increasing numbers of pullets per cage
and the
use of the manure belt system [3]. In Brazil,
outbreaks of coccidiosis
became noticeable in caged layers after layer companies changed from
the
traditional system, where droppings fall onto the house floor, to the
manure
belt system [4]. The spreading of oocysts through the manure belts
seems
self-evident. However, it’s still uncertain as to how these
oocysts initially
infect birds during rearing and early egg production.
Coccidiosis in pullets
raised in cages,
although mostly sub-clinical, appeared to be unpredictable both in
terms of
timing and severity. In fact, some of these sub-clinical infections are
noticed
only because of increases in morbidity and mortality caused by
secondary agents
such as Clostridium. (Necrotic
Enteritis)
[2].
Control
programs for
coccidiosis in the egg industry are variable, however, data from the U.S.
show that
all pullets have some type of anticoccidial program [5]. Anticoccidial
drugs
are used for the majority of birds raised on the floor, but less so in
cage-reared pullets. Only slightly more than half of caged pullets have
some
type of anti-coccidial program (Table 1).
Coccidiosis in
layers (floor or cage reared) has
been increasingly reported shortly after the hens start to lay,
particularly around
23 to 24 weeks of age [6]. A reduction of egg production for several
weeks is
not uncommon. There are several explanations for the outbreak of
coccidiosis in
this period, but it is commonly agreed that low immunity is most likely
the
cause [1,2,3,7]. It is difficult for birds raised on wire to develop
protective immunity due to few opportunities to contact sporulated
oocysts for
recycling.
Early
floor-reared
layer pullets receiving anticoccidials have been suggested to rely on
“leakage”
of oocysts to generate protective immune response. Generally,
anticoccidials
are withdrawn long before birds come into lay, therefore the immunity
acquired
through “leakage” is likely to be incapable of
protecting hens through the
production period
[7].
Besides, there is no set idea on the size of
“leakage”, nor what size of challenge is needed
during the rearing period to
extend the immunity into egg production. Often, answers to this
question do not
become clear until the birds start production. This uncertainty led
caged layer
producers to adopt the use of vaccine to reduce the risk of coccidiosis
especially during the production period.
In the past,
the use of coccidiosis vaccines in
caged birds met with limited success because of poor recycling.
Recycling, or
repeated exposures to oocysts, is necessary for establishing protective
immunity [8]. Some producers adopted double
vaccination during the rearing to replace recycling, but this practice
is
deemed expensive.
Our
objective was to
summarize attempts in the past few years to encourage recycling and to
describe
an encouraging approach that lead to little or no coccidiosis problem.
Field Reports
Before the
present approach of encouraging
recycling, several other approaches were also tried, including covering
the cage
floor with newspaper for up to 4 weeks; trying several
types of corrugated
paper products; vaccinating birds at two
different ages, but all with limited success. Seemingly, the newspaper
approach encouraged too much recycling
resulting in some coccidiosis breaks. Corrugated paper products could
not
withstand scratching and mostly disintegrated within a life cycle of
coccidia
or 7 days and, therefore, were unsuitable for promoting recycling. A
ratio of
about 4 paper plates/cage was attempted but with some coccidiosis
breaks
around 3 to 4 weeks of age, not unlike the results seen when cage
floors were
covered with newspaper. The first successful
attempt with the paper plate approach was noted in
1999 to 2000. Two
flocks of about
42,500 day-old layers each were vaccinated once with 1 gel-puck on one
15 cm (diameter) or 6” round paper plate
(Figure 1) at ratio of about 50 birds/puck with the following results
(Table 2).
Egg production per hen housed appeared to be better than expected in
either
strain of layers by at least 10 eggs with no problem of coccidiosis
throughout
rearing and production. Since then, 2 flocks per year, or 6 additional flocks,
have been vaccinated at the same farm with similar results with little
or no problem
of coccidiosis.
FIGURE 1. Gel-delivered vaccine and
paper plate used for layers.
Brooding cage (60 x 90 cm): 46
birds/cage from 0 to 4 wk.
There
was a lapse of
over 3 years before a close examination of this approach was made. This
was
due, in part, to problems that arose from trying other approaches,
i.e.:
newspaper to cover cages and others, and partly because there
was no clear evidence of cause and effect on coccidiosis tied in with
the
performance of caged layers.
Here, we were
provided a clearer evidence of
cause and effect on coccidiosis and caged layer performance. This
particular
farm, of about 75,000 birds, broke with coccidiosis in previous
non-vaccinated
flock. The flock experienced a significant
overall reduction
in the number of eggs per hen housed together with increased mortality.
The
drop in egg production continued and extended to 8 weeks before
recovering
(Figure 2). Overall, this flock peaked at
over 90% egg production for only a brief
6
weeks. The present
flock on this farm was vaccinated against coccidiosis with gel-puck on
paper
plates at a ratio of 50 chicks/plate at day old. Birds were given other
vaccinations common to the egg layers and were fed a diet with 18.5%
protein
for laying hens. The paper plates stayed in place for about 2 weeks or
until
they were shredded by the birds. Performance to 47 wk shows egg
production of
over 90% from 23 wk to 47 wk (Figure 2), with a total mortality of 1.4%
and a
total egg production of 175.1 eggs per hen housed.
Conclusion and Application
1.
This report describes a method of vaccinating
cage-reared layers with coccidiosis vaccine in gel pucks on 15 cm paper
plates
at a ratio about 50 chicks/per plate. The paper plates were placed at 1
day of
age and remained for about 2 wk in cages to promote recycling.
2. Egg
layers vaccinated with this method had little or no problem with
coccidiosis.
To date, all caged layers so treated consistently produced more eggs
than
expected, showing that this method of vaccination effectively
controlled
the adverse effects of coccidiosis in caged layers.
References
Available upon request from:
immucox@vetechinc.com
Disclaimer
Copyright © 2007, Vetech Laboratories Inc.